Don't Trust Your AI Agents. Test Them Like a Scientist — Stephanie Jarmak, Omni Analytics
Stephanie Jarmak, a former astronomer who now builds evals at Omni Analytics after building a large coding benchmark at Sourcegraph, argues that most agent evaluations are easy to misread.
She shows how swapping only the harness moved results by 30%, why public benchmarks are for shortlisting rather than decisions, and how to design your own evals like an experiment: realistic tasks, repeated runs, full traces and a measurement that matches what you care about. She also covers quality gates that actually stop work, the human review bottleneck, agent records you can't trust, and why production is the final test. Chapters: - 00:00 Intro - 01:11 When the agent ignores your tool - 02:47 The harness changes the results - 03:51 Public benchmarks vs.
Texten är källans egen beskrivning av publiceringen. Innehållet tillhör AI Engineer.
Mer att läsa
Lumaril, which develops AI software for optimizing industrial production by connecting to existing control systems, raised a $66M Series A at a $400M valuation
Techmeme för 2 tim sedan
DeepSeek open sources Super-Agent as a research prototype, a proactive coding agent it says can monitor group chats for coding issues and suggest solutions
Techmeme för 2 tim sedan
Insurance software maker Guidewire agrees to acquire Hyperexponential, which makes AI-powered insurance underwriting and pricing software, for $1.7B in cash
Techmeme för 2 tim sedan
One word for AI agents in 2027
Nate Herk för 6 tim sedan
